Tuesday 5 June 2012

Ink Spots

In order to escape the huge amount of crap everywhere about that old lady being Queen for 60 years, I suggested to my better half that we venture out to rent a film for the night.

Naturally, it took about 20 minutes to come to any kind of vague consensus on what to choose, which got me wondering how many couples break up in the aisles of DVD rental shops. It's easy to get to a point where you just shout "well, pick what you fucking want then!" and storm out in a strop.

Mercifully, this didn't happen to us and I finally agreed to take out The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. I hadn't read the books, crime fiction not being my thing, and the amount of hype around them doubly put me off.  As for the film? Well, it didn't do a lot to convince me to investigate further.

Not that it's a bad film. It certainly looks the part, with some nice contrasts between urban and rural Sweden, the rustic house the male lead inhabits with the clean lines of the modern house of another character.

The problems start with the characters, none of whom are particularly likeable. Daniel Craig as a disgraced journalist is requested by a wealthy industrialist to investigate the disappearance of his niece decades earlier. Thing is, the character is such a complete drip at times, and a total "anything with a pulse" shagger the next that it's hard to root for him in solving the mystery.

Then, of course, there's Oscar-nominee Rooney Mara as Lisbeth, the titular character and one made up of so many clichés it's amazing. Troubled past? Check. Socially awkward genius? Check. Just once, it'd be nice to see one of these characters who doesn't have a whole lot of dark shit in their past. It's almost like a game where writers try to come up with the worst horrors possible. To Mara's credit, she does a good job with what she's given to work with.

None of which might matter if the central story held up. But it's full of some major plot holes that lead up to a final twist that if you're paying enough attention you should see coming from a country mile off. Part of the problem is that it feels like the whole story would be best strapped to a TV mini-series, as at two-and-a-half hours, it takes too much time getting started but also doesn't have enough time to develop the details. As in, was the big cheese really waiting all those years just for some discredited hack to roll up? How did the owner of the torture chamber keep it a secret for years?

On the plus side, the vast majority of it is acted really well: Christopher Plummer and Steven Berkoff do their usual fine work as the man needing answers about his long-lost niece and the lawyer who gets Daniel Craig the job. Weirdly, Jim Robinson from Neighbours rocks up in a small role, which makes you wonder why they didn't hire more Swedish people for the parts, rather than getting others to do slightly dodgy accents.

It's a not a crap film, not by any measure. It's so average that I doubt I'll remember any of it in six months.

3 comments:

  1. I haven't seen the American version of the film, but I've read the book and seen the Swedish version of the film. I agree with you that there are some serious flaws (Mikael shagging everyone, Lisbeth being the sort of autistic genius that is everywhere in fiction (why are there never any regular autistic people?), insane levels of abuse etc)... yet despite all of that I was gripped by the story and intruiged by the characters, plus I've never been to Sweden so I just found it interesting to learn a bit about the place.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Northern Europe *is* a very weird place. I think it's the way they have loads of darkness in winter, and the opposite in summer. I wasn't sure about the implication of one character (in the film, at least) that Swedish people are closest Nazis, though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No, a member if the family was a fascist but he was disowned by the family. If you read the book it would make more sense!

    ReplyDelete